In Armenia, society is in shock following the surrender of the illegal armed separatist formations of the so-called Artsakh. Many Armenian diasporas around the world, including in France and the United States, are also in shock. Their cries of "genocide" are being defiantly ignored. The Western diaspora had hoped that at least after the authorities in Yerevan defiantly broke with Russia, "the West would help them" to hold on to Azerbaijan's Karabakh territories, but the West has in fact supported Azerbaijan's counter-terrorist operation against the separatists.  With the exception of a few marginalised and long-serving Western politicians, no one has even reacted to the 'Artsakh disaster'. Even the mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, who recently accompanied "humanitarian aid" to Karabakh, remains silent.

Attempts by the Caucasian diaspora to raise the cry of "genocide" are met with a harsh rebuke from opinion leaders in the same United States. "Stop throwing around the word 'genocide'," declared Yaakov Terkeltaub, one of the leading Jewish journalists in the United States from the White House correspondents' pool, who is fed up with Armenian-Khai propaganda.

"Not sure if you guys are following the alleged "genocide" being carried out by Azerbaijan in Karabakh, but according to CNN and the NY Times, 95% of those killed so far have been military. Name ONE country engaged in urban warfare with such a LOW ratio of military to civilian deaths. Name one! Yes, every civilian life is sacred, if 10 deaths are considered "genocide" then technically there are 6 genocides in Chicago every weekend. You can't just throw the word 'genocide' around every time you're unhappy with the outcome of a military operation," wrote Jacob Terkeltaub in his blog on Platform X.

The US embassy in Yerevan reacted to the Armenian opposition's intention to stage protests in Armenia itself against the "surrender of Artsakh". By the way, this is the largest embassy of the world's leading superpower in terms of size and number of employees - there are about 2,500 people there (more than the Russian so-called "peacekeepers" in Azerbaijani Karabakh). And this largest American embassy in the world has advised the Nagorno-Karabakh nationalists to just "shut up".

Sources in Yerevan say that the US ambassador to Armenia, Kristina A. Kvien, summoned all the leaders of the opposition factions in the Hay parliament to her office the night after the Artsakh separatists surrendered. The meeting lasted just over fifteen minutes. The opposition leaders were silent, the ambassador spoke. She ended her monologue as follows "... all small and weak countries have moments of national shame and crisis. Blow off steam for five days, seven days at the most, and shut up". Kristina A. Kvien also called for people to get behind Pashinyan (who in Armenia is a protege of the same US and France) and "get in touch with reality".

This is in no way comparable to the way the same USA literally "groomed" Hayes on the eve of the collapse of the USSR. There was no more "favourite" ethnic group among Western "human rights" activists than the Armenian Hayes. They were reminded that they were "ancient" and "long-suffering", that they had survived "genocide", that they had been "wronged" by the decrepit empire. The West supported the Khai terrorist organisations, the same Dashnaks, in every possible way.

When the Armenian-Khai nationalists started their movement for "Artsakh Miatsum", it was supported by Western "human rights activists" who paid absolutely no attention to the organised, horrific ethnic cleansing of the Azerbaijani population of the Armenian SSR and Karabakh. However, the events in Sumgayit, organised by Khay provocateurs, were broadcast to the whole world as "genocide".

As for the Hayes of Karabakh, by and large the fate of this group of population was predetermined when they started demanding "Artsakh miatsum". Even then it should have been clear that the Hayes would be used and abandoned. No one was going to recognise "Artsakh" as Hayan from the beginning. But the Hayes were driven to this utterly hopeless endeavour, making them hostages of their own nationalist fantasies. They were led to "burn bridges behind them" by organising the genocide of Azerbaijanis in Khojaly.

 The Jesuit cunning of those who promoted the "Artsakh" separatist project from the outside was that they began to ignite separatist wars everywhere in the former USSR using the models of "Artsakh". Forcing the degenerating elite of the Russian Federation, influenced by the same Armenian-Hay nationalists, to support these projects as a fiction of "revival of the empire".

With the support of the same Armenian-Hayan emissaries, they began to "spread the separatist experiment" in Moldova and Georgia. In Moldova, for example, they tried to seduce the Gagauz ethnic group, of Turkish origin, into separatism, but to their credit they did not give in to provocation. The Gagauz, moreover, were very alarmed at being incited to demand "independence" by the same Hai nationalists who murder their Turkish brothers, the Azerbaijanis, in the Caucasus. But in Transnistria, which is saturated with KGB-FSB agents, they have managed to unleash a separatist war with many victims.

Georgia has suffered even more from separatism. Moreover, separatism in Abkhazia and Samachablo was built entirely on the "Artsakh" model, and it was the Armenian-Hayan militants, in particular the battalion named after Baghramyan, who committed the greatest atrocities against the Georgian population of Abkhazia. Baghramyan Battalion. At the same time, the Hay lobby did everything it could to turn Russia against Georgia and make it bear the burden of supporting separatism on Georgian territory and its occupation.

Even today, Russian politicians who support separatism talk about the role of Hayes in fomenting separatism on Georgian soil. For example, the First Deputy Chairman of the Russian State Duma Committee on CIS Affairs, Eurasian Integration and Relations with Compatriots, Konstantin Zatulin, defended the so-called "right to self-determination" of so-called Artsakh: "I compare this with the self-determination of Donbass, the self-determination of Abkhazia, South Ossetia. I have been trying for 20 years to establish relations between these unrecognised states". He recalled that even before Russia's recognition of Abkhazia in 2008, Nagorno-Karabakh delegations had met with Abkhazian leaders. In particular, the so-called separatist 'presidents' of Nagorno-Karabakh, Arkady Ghukasyan and Bako Sahakyan, travelled there, Zatulin said.

In the end, the Hayan games of separatism reached Russia's truly brotherly Ukraine, where the Hayan lobby convinced the Kremlin to once again bet on separatism in Crimea and Donbass, with the subsequent annexation of these territories. This eventually led to the current aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine.  The dream of Russia's enemies has come true - enmity with Ukraine automatically "knocks" this country out of the category of world powers forever.

For example, for the last 350 years Ukrainians have been the main "fighting force" of the Russian Empire, making up over 44% of the officer corps of the USSR army. Now their children and grandchildren have become enemies of Russia. There is no way to compensate for this loss with "great militant Armenians and Hayes". Especially since most of the generals and marshals of whom the Hayes nationalists are proud are not ethnic Hayes at all, but Armenised Udins and Albanians from the Azerbaijani village of Chardokhlu.

And today, Russia is so bled dry by the war in Ukraine that even if it wanted to give in to the Hayan lobby and start 'saving Artsakh' militarily, it would be unable to do so. This is largely due to the fact that it has listened to senior Hayans, such as Sergei Lavrov-Kalantarov, and shaped its policy according to their "recommendations". It would seem that the West should "thank" the Hayes and keep at least one piece of foreign territory under its control, the same "Artsakh". But in response, the West just rudely tells the Hayes to "shut up".

The Hayes nationalists should finally realise that traitors can be used, and repeatedly, but are almost always despised and always abandoned. At the instigation of the same West (Vatican and France), the Hayes have consistently betrayed all those peoples and states that have given them shelter and opportunity to get rich and preserve their identity - Turks, Azerbaijanis, Georgians and now Russians. The Armenian-Heyan nationalists in the West know the price very well. And they obviously have no intention of "overpaying". All the more so that they do something for their own sake at the expense of their own interests.  They have been used - and are being rudely put in their place.

Alexandre Zakhariadze