Whatever the "ordinary" nationalists have on their minds, the extremists have on their tongues. The way in which Armenian nationalists really feel about Russia was very much expressed by Varuzhan Avetisyan, one of the leaders of the terrorist organisation Sasna Tsrer.

In other words, for Armenian nationalists, Russia, the country to which the Armenian people owe their statehood and existence as a country in the Caucasus in general, is a "crumbling and rotten system". Russia, according to Avetisyan "is teased and laughed at".

But here who puts Russia in the most difficult situations? Who brings Russia to this state? Who actually destroys it? Who drives Russia into virtually hopeless geopolitical situations that can end in nothing but disaster?

Varuzhan Avetisyan did not specify it. But his compatriot Sergey Lavrov-Kalontarov recently distinguished himself by putting Russia in a critical situation of almost inevitable armed conflict with the entire Western world, where forces are clearly not equal and definitely not on the side of Russia.

At his annual foreign policy press conference on 14 January 2022, after diplomatic talks with NATO and the US failed to make progress because of the Russian troop build-up on the Ukrainian border, Sergey Lavrov-Kalantarov distinguished himself with an emphatically "bellicose" statement.

"Our patience has come to an end. We are very patient. But you know we take a long time, don't you? We have been harnessing for a very long time; it's time for us to go... Looking forward to hearing from our colleagues, to getting answers in writing, put them on paper, just as we have done with our suggestions. But in the meantime, of course, we will continue to work on making sure that we are prepared in any scenario," Lavrov said.

Overall, an aggressive "self-confidence" from the representative of a country that "has forgotten how to manufacture even washing machines (in the words of Varuzhan Avetisyan). This may seem to be a form of madness. After all today any collision with the same NATO bloc will turn out for the Russian Federation to be a catastrophe.

Yet even if there is no clash, the new sanctions, given that the previous ones have already technically "backfired" on Russia, will be fatal for it. Russia simply will not be able to buy components for its modern armaments, especially electronics, and it simply cannot produce "its own".

Nevertheless, Russian hurrah-patriots have taken the crazy words of Lavrov-Kalontarov, who is dragging Russia into an almost hopeless conflict for it, "with a bang". And there is no need to be surprised, because the propaganda in Russia has long been controlled by the Armenian lobby. It seems that the Armenian lobby is "fast-tracking" Russia into hopeless dead ends. There is, alas, only one way out of which in today's realities is the collapse of what was once a great country.

Current events around Kazakhstan. The deployment of CSTO troops in this country was "announced" by Nikol Pashinyan. Margarita Simonyan fomented the "hurrah-patriotic hysteria" with the need to introduce troops into Kazakhstan "to protect Russian interests", and an Armenian contingent entered Almaty together with the Russian military within the framework of the same CSTO.

But the troop withdrawal also started after Pashinyan's consultations with Kazakh President Tokayev. In other words, the impression was that in the case of Kazakhstan, the Armenians were "playing Russia any way they wanted".

They have "dragged" it into Kazakhstan, almost dragged it into a war on its eastern borders (although there is a risk that the most unpredictable events are still possible in Kazakhstan, and that Russia, already "lit up" with the support of Tokayev, is fully dragged there), and also quickly "withdrew" Russian troops. Moreover, the decision to rapidly withdraw coincided with the concentration of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border and the Lavrov-Kalantarov "ultimatum". In other words, the troops were not withdrawn "willingly", but only because another war was on the horizon.

In other words, thanks to the Armenian lobby, Russia has already "outlined an eastern front". And at the same time it is being dragged into a war "on the western front". At the same time some Armenian nationalists, the same Varuzhan Avetisyan, are already saying openly that Russia is weak and doomed. Especially with this insane policy.

However, why then would the Armenian nationalists at the helm in Russia "destroy the ship they are sailing on" by directly pointing it at the iceberg and ultimatumatically shouting for the huge ice floe to "get out of the way" and making it clear that they are not afraid of a collision? Although it is clear how the collision will end.

Is this madness a well thought out strategy? Or does the Armenian lobby have a "fallback boat" and someone promised them a "new paradise"?

That is most likely exactly what it is.

It should be recalled that the "control centres" of the Armenian project are not in Russia at all. The Armenians are allowed to use Russia in much the same way as a sponger uses his "master", sucking all the juices out of him and bringing him closer to ruin. And it seems that high-ranking Armenian nationalists understand perfectly well that with their help Russia will inevitably perish (unless, of course, it stops listening to them).

But before Russia perishes, according to the architects of the new world order, it must provoke chaos. Including on those lands that Armenian nationalists were promised to their "great" Armenia. There is nothing new in this. Similarly, Armenian nationalists were promised "great Armenia" on the eve of World War I in the lands of the Ottoman and Russian empires - so they were more than anyone else expecting the outbreak of world carnage and chaos. They simply did not set the policy of Russia at the time and could not bring the catastrophe any closer on their own initiative.

Today, in the person of the same Lavrov-Kalontarov, the Armenian lobby determines Russia's policy and leads it to ruin. Not fully realising that in the end this ruin may result in the final demise of the Armenian people, who will not be able to take advantage of Russia's demise as they did not manage to take advantage of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the end.

The freeloaders used Russia, and now they do not need it and ruin it, and consciously, but they do not ask themselves the question: would their "new masters" agree to have them after Russia's demise? Will the U.S. "stick them on their necks", tolerate their antics, allow their representatives to rise to the highest levels of power the way they let Kalontarov and Mishustin to do in today's Russia? It is doubtful...

Kavkazplus